Miro vs. FigJam: Which Tool Is Right for Your Team?

Miro and FigJam are two online whiteboards with different strengths. Miro covers a broad range of whiteboarding and planning features, while FigJam is closely integrated into Figma’s design suite and primarily targets product teams. Collaboard offers another option for organizations that prioritize data privacy and hosting in Europe.

Miro vs. FigJam: Key Takeaways

• Miro offers extensive whiteboarding, diagramming and planning features, along with numerous integrations for teams with varied workflows.
• As part of the Figma suite, FigJam is closely connected to design files and Dev Mode. It is particularly well suited to design and product teams already using Figma.
• The two tools differ significantly in price and features: FigJam offers an affordable entry point through a Collab seat, while Miro provides more facilitation features for structured workshops.
• Collaboard adds an alternative with a choice of hosting in Germany, the Netherlands and Switzerland, as well as on-premises deployment for organizations with strict data protection requirements.

What Are Miro and FigJam?

Miro and FigJam are online whiteboards where teams can collect, organize and edit content together in real time. Both are among the best-known interactive whiteboards for hybrid teams. Their main difference lies in their origins and target audiences: Miro was developed as a standalone whiteboarding product, while FigJam was created as an extension of Figma for design teams.

What Is Miro?

Miro brings whiteboarding, diagrams and project planning together on one canvas. Teams use it for brainstorming, roadmaps, retrospectives and agile ceremonies. More than 2,500 templates cover a wide range of common workflows.
Miro suits teams that want to bring different ways of working together on one platform, from initial ideation to ongoing project documentation. Its canvas is designed for complex, long-running boards with many objects.

What Is FigJam?

FigJam is the whiteboarding component of the Figma suite and is aimed primarily at design and product teams. It sits alongside Figma Design and Figma Slides and connects closely with Figma Design, allowing teams to move content and components between file types.
Numerous templates cover design-related activities in particular, such as retrospectives, user flows and ideation boards. Teams already using Figma can work in FigJam without switching to another tool.

What Features Do Miro and FigJam Offer?

Miro and FigJam both cover the basics of a whiteboard: sticky notes, shapes, freehand drawing, comments and templates. The differences lie in the depth and focus of their features, including diagrams, tables and design tools.

Both tools are sufficient for spontaneous brainstorming. If you also need Kanban boards, diagrams or extensive brainstorming tools for structured sessions, Miro offers a broader range of integrations. For a wider view of the market, see our overview of the best whiteboard software.

How Do Miro’s and FigJam’s AI Features Compare?

Miro and FigJam have both expanded their AI features considerably since 2025. Their AI tools differ, however, in scope and purpose.

Miro AI at a Glance

Miro AI summarizes boards, automatically groups sticky notes by topic and creates diagrams or mind maps from text prompts. At Miro’s Canvas 26 event in May 2026, the existing Sidekicks were developed into agentic assistants that draw context from connected tools such as Slack or GitHub to build boards or diagrams.
As of July 2026, some of these features were still in beta or being rolled out gradually. The number of included AI credits depends on the plan, and additional credit packages are available if needed.

FigJam AI at a Glance

FigJam AI automatically organizes sticky notes, creates layouts from short descriptions and summarizes board content. Its AI features are embedded in the Figma platform and focus more on ideation than complex analysis.
FigJam’s AI credits are included from the Professional plan onward and are shared with other Figma products. The available credits and features depend on the plan and seat type. Credits can be used across Figma’s AI features.

How Do Miro and FigJam Compare for Collaboration and Integrations?

Miro and FigJam both support real-time editing, comments and guest access. The bigger difference is the number and type of integrations they offer.

Miro stands out for its broad range of integrations with project management and communication tools. FigJam comes into its own when a team already uses Figma Design or Dev Mode, because boards and design files live in the same tool. If you are looking for collaboration tools for your entire organization, this difference is worth considering.

How Do Miro and FigJam Compare on Data Privacy and Hosting?

Miro and FigJam primarily store data in their respective providers’ clouds. For organizations with stricter data protection requirements, such as public sector bodies, universities or highly regulated industries, it is useful to look closely at data location, certifications and available controls.

For FigJam, EU storage also applies only to file content. Metadata, comments, login data and activity logs are excluded. Miro stores EU data primarily in Ireland, with backups in Germany, but does not offer deployment on your own infrastructure.

Collaboard offers additional hosting options. From the Advanced plan, you can choose between Microsoft Azure in Switzerland or the Netherlands, or hosting in Germany for an extra fee. Enterprise adds self-hosting, private hosting options and deployment in your own cloud environment, such as AWS or Microsoft Azure, as well as fully isolated air-gapped deployment.

What to check – In addition to server location, ask each provider about its data processing agreement, subprocessors, deletion periods and the validity period of invitation links before choosing a tool. Collaboard also allows you to enable or disable individual features.

How Much Do Miro and FigJam Cost?

Miro and FigJam both offer a free way to get started, as well as paid plans priced per user per month. Miro’s pricing is based on full member seats. FigJam is part of Figma’s pricing model and uses different seat types: a Collab seat covers whiteboard access, while a Full seat provides full design access. It therefore makes sense to compare FigJam and Miro prices at the individual seat level.

‍FigJam vs. Miro pricing at a glance:

Which Tool Suits Which Team?

Choosing between Miro and FigJam depends less on individual features than on how your team works every day. Four scenarios can help you decide.

• Design and product teams already using Figma can avoid switching tools with FigJam, because design files and whiteboards live in the same ecosystem.
• Cross-functional teams running workshops, roadmaps and agile ceremonies can benefit from Miro’s broader set of tools. If that range of features becomes too much, Miro alternatives with a simpler interface may help.
• Teams primarily facilitating guided workshops and retrospectives often consider Mural as well, along with Mural alternatives with a similar focus on facilitation.
• Organizations with strict data protection requirements, such as public sector bodies, universities or highly regulated industries, can consider Collaboard as a Miro and FigJam alternative with a choice of hosting locations in Europe.

Conclusion: Which Whiteboard Tool Is Right for Your Team?

Miro, FigJam and Collaboard share core whiteboarding features: sticky notes, shapes, comments and real-time editing are standard in all three tools. Their differences lie in the breadth of their tools, AI features and, above all, data privacy and hosting.
Miro offers an extensive template library for different workflows. FigJam stands out for its close connection to Figma Design for teams in the Figma ecosystem.
‍

Before making a choice, consider:

• Which features does your team use regularly: diagrams, design tools or workshop facilitation features?
• How many boards and guests are included in the plan you want?
• Which apps need to connect to the whiteboard, such as Jira, Slack or Figma Design?
• Where should board content and metadata be stored?
• Do you need cloud hosting or a self-hosting option?
• Which security features, such as SSO or 2FA, are included in the plan?

If your organization has specific requirements for data location and access, as is often the case for public authorities, universities or banks, Collaboard may be worth considering. It combines whiteboarding and facilitation features with a choice of cloud locations in Europe and self-hosting options.