Lucidspark vs. Miro: Which Online Whiteboard Is Right for Your Team?

Lucidspark and Miro are two of the best-known online whiteboards for brainstorming, diagramming, and teamwork. But a closer Lucidspark vs. Miro comparison quickly reveals important differences in features, pricing, and data privacy. Collaboard adds a third option for teams that place particular importance on data residency and control over their hosting environment.

Lucidspark vs. Miro: Key Takeaways

• Lucidspark is Lucid Software’s whiteboard product, combining brainstorming with structured diagramming through a bidirectional connection to Lucidchart.
• Miro offers a broader feature set than Lucidspark, with mind maps, Kanban boards, roadmaps, documents, and more than 250 integrations.
• Their entry-level paid plans are similarly priced: Lucidspark costs €10 per user per month on the Team plan, while Miro’s Starter plan costs €8 per member per month.
• Collaboard is an alternative to Lucidspark and Miro for teams with strict data-protection requirements, combining whiteboarding, facilitation, and task planning with a choice of hosting in Germany, Switzerland, or the Netherlands, as well as full on-premises deployment.

What Is the Core Difference Between Lucidspark and Miro?

Lucidspark is designed around ideation and the transition from brainstorming to structured diagrams, while Miro is a broader online whiteboard that supports many different ways of working on a single canvas. Within the wider landscape of collaboration tools, both are among the most established names. Both products have a 4.7 out of 5 rating on GetApp, with Miro based on around 1,700 reviews and Lucidspark on approximately 385 reviews.

Lucidspark: Ideation with a Direct Connection to Lucidchart

Lucidspark is developed by Lucid Software, the company behind Lucidchart. You can import existing Lucidchart documents into a board or export finished results back to Lucidchart for polished, presentation-ready output. A timer, voting features, and breakout boards for parallel small-group work support facilitated sessions. An AI assistant can generate boards from prompts, group content, and summarize ideas. Beyond Lucidspark, there are many other brainstorming tools focused specifically on ideation without a fixed connection to a diagramming application.

Miro: Multiple Ways of Working on One Canvas

Miro combines whiteboarding, diagramming, Kanban, roadmaps, documents, and presentations in a shared workspace. It also provides community templates, AI workflows, and connectors for external tools. As a result, Miro supports a wider range of work formats on a single canvas, while Lucidspark places greater emphasis on ideation combined with Lucidchart. If you are specifically looking for Miro whiteboard features such as mind maps, Kanban boards, and diagrams, you will find them integrated within the same board.

For teams that also value facilitation, task planning, and the ability to choose where their data is hosted, Collaboard is worth considering as a third option.

What Features Do Lucidspark and Miro Offer?

Both tools cover the core capabilities of an online whiteboard: an unlimited canvas, sticky notes, freehand drawing, and templates. The main differences become more noticeable in diagramming, AI capabilities, and the way larger boards are structured.

Lucidspark offers more than 100 integrations, including Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Drive, Zoom, Jira, Confluence, and Asana, plus an MCP server for AI tools such as ChatGPT and Claude. Miro offers more than 250 integrations as well as a developer platform for building custom connections.

Collaboard takes a somewhat different approach in areas such as task planning, facilitation cards, and direct audio elements on the board, as the table illustrates.

How Do Lucidspark and Miro Compare for Collaboration and Integrations?

Lucidspark and Miro both allow multiple people to edit a board simultaneously in real time. The main differences lie in the depth of permission management and the number of available integrations.

Their integration strategies also differ: Lucidspark and Miro cover a wider range of mainstream business tools, while Collaboard places greater emphasis on integrations for controlled and security-sensitive IT environments.

Permissions and Guest Access in Lucidspark and Miro

In Lucidspark, you can decide whether collaborators may edit, comment, or only view a board. A shared link can take participants directly to the relevant area of the board, so they do not have to navigate the entire canvas. Miro distinguishes between visitors on public boards and signed-in guests on private boards, with separate permissions for viewing, commenting, and editing.

If you want guests to participate without creating their own account while keeping facilitation clearly controlled, it is worth looking at Collaboard’s separate access levels in the data privacy section below.

These sharing and access controls are central to any online whiteboard, regardless of which provider you ultimately choose.

How Do Lucidspark and Miro Compare on Data Privacy and Hosting?

When boards contain confidential project plans, research data, or public-sector processes, where the data is stored can matter just as much as the feature set. This is an area where Lucidspark and Miro differ significantly from Collaboard.

Data Location with Lucidspark and Miro

Lucidspark hosts customer data on AWS infrastructure. Personal data transfers from the EU to the United States are handled through Standard Contractual Clauses and the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework. According to Lucid, a dedicated data residency program with regions such as the EU is available on higher-tier plans. With EU data residency enabled, Miro stores board content primarily in Ireland and also backs it up in Germany; however, data from connected third-party applications may be processed outside that region.

Both providers hold ISO 27001 certification and SOC 2 Type II reports and provide measures designed to support GDPR-compliant use. Their published deployment options do not include on-premises operation.

Flexible Hosting Options with Collaboard

Collaboard can be particularly relevant if you need greater control over data residency and infrastructure. You can choose between the Open Telekom Cloud in Germany, Microsoft Azure in Switzerland or the Netherlands, or AWS. With the Enterprise plan, Collaboard can also be deployed fully on-premises and, if required, as an air-gapped environment with no connection to the internet. Additional options include:

• Your own logo and color scheme
• Features that can be enabled individually
• A customizable privacy disclaimer
• A configurable validity period for invitation links

How Much Do Lucidspark and Miro Cost?

Lucidspark and Miro both offer a free entry point as well as several paid plans. As with most providers of whiteboard software, it is worth looking beyond the headline entry price.

Lucidspark’s Individual plan is designed for a single user and is therefore not directly comparable with the team-oriented entry-level plans from Miro and Collaboard. If you work as part of a team, you will generally need the corresponding Lucidspark Team plan.

What to consider beyond the headline price:

• How many boards and guests are included in the plan?
• From which plan are SSO, audit logs, or admin permissions available?
• Which hosting options can you choose from?
• Is there a minimum number of licenses you need to purchase?

Collaboard can be attractive here because the Basic plan already includes unlimited boards and up to 20 guests with access permissions per board, with no minimum license commitment.

Keep Control of Where Your Whiteboard Data Is Stored and Who Can Access It

Whether Lucidspark or Miro is the better fit for your team depends less on the basic feature set and more on your requirements for integrations, pricing, and data privacy. Before choosing a platform, consider:

• How many boards, guests, and integrations do you need in day-to-day work?
• What permissions should internal and external participants have?
• Where should board content and backups be stored?
• Is cloud hosting sufficient, or do you need on-premises deployment or an isolated network?
• Which admin and security features are included in the plan you are considering?
• What is the minimum license commitment for the plan you need?

If neither tool meets your requirements for hosting control and data privacy, it is worth considering Collaboard alongside other Miro alternatives.

A free trial with a real project is the fastest way to find out whether the features, permission model, and hosting options fit your workflows.

‍